Talk:Frieda Bergmann - Revision history

Necrodem at 05:08, 28 July 2016

2016-07-28T05:08:30Z

Crumist: Blanked the page

2014-02-19T03:03:13Z

Blanked the page

Crumist at 03:02, 19 February 2014

2014-02-19T03:02:29Z

Crumist at 03:01, 19 February 2014

2014-02-19T03:01:19Z

Crumist: Created page with "Tips: Discarding small planets I believe the advice to delete any planets of 4 or less zones is misguided, rather smaller planets may be preferred in situations where fuel i..."

2014-02-19T03:00:18Z

Created page with "Tips: Discarding small planets I believe the advice to delete any planets of 4 or less zones is misguided, rather smaller planets may be preferred in situations where fuel i..."

New page

Tips: Discarding small planets
I believe the advice to delete any planets of 4 or less zones is misguided, rather smaller planets may be preferred in situations where fuel is less of a priority. The possibility of a small planet having O2 or hydrocarbon deposit without any hazards makes scanning smaller planets likely the most efficient use of the scanner's AP. By contrast, investing many APs into a large planet which then ends up having a Mankarog is a gigantic waste. The 2AP spent discovering a planet is spent before its size is revealed, meaning that it does not play into the efficiency at all. The only issue with small planets is the high cost of fuel zipping around for that one O2 source, whereas a larger planet may have given O2, steaks, and fuel.

← Older revision	Revision as of 05:08, 28 July 2016
Line 1:	Line 1:
−	+	To check: maximum glory from task 10.
	+	[[User:Necrodem\|Necrodem]] ([[User talk:Necrodem\|talk]]) 23:08, 27 July 2016 (MDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:03, 19 February 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	~~== Tips: Discarding small planets ==~~

−	I believe the advice to delete any planets of 4 or less zones is misguided, rather smaller planets may be preferred in situations where fuel is less of a priority. The possibility of a small planet having O2 or hydrocarbon deposit without any hazards makes scanning smaller planets likely the most efficient use of the scanner's AP. By contrast, investing many APs into a large planet which then ends up having a Mankarog is a gigantic waste. The 2AP spent discovering a planet is spent before its size is revealed, meaning that it does not play into the efficiency at all. The only issue with small planets is the high cost of fuel zipping around for that one O2 source, whereas a larger planet may have given O2, steaks, and fuel.[[User:Crumist\|Crumist]] ([[User talk:Crumist\|talk]]) 20:01, 18 February 2014 (MST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:02, 19 February 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	~Tips: Discarding small planets	+	== Tips: Discarding small planets ==
−	~I believe the advice to delete any planets of 4 or less zones is misguided, rather smaller planets may be preferred in situations where fuel is less of a priority. The possibility of a small planet having O2 or hydrocarbon deposit without any hazards makes scanning smaller planets likely the most efficient use of the scanner's AP. By contrast, investing many APs into a large planet which then ends up having a Mankarog is a gigantic waste. The 2AP spent discovering a planet is spent before its size is revealed, meaning that it does not play into the efficiency at all. The only issue with small planets is the high cost of fuel zipping around for that one O2 source, whereas a larger planet may have given O2, steaks, and fuel.[[User:Crumist\|Crumist]] ([[User talk:Crumist\|talk]]) 20:01, 18 February 2014 (MST)	+
		+	I believe the advice to delete any planets of 4 or less zones is misguided, rather smaller planets may be preferred in situations where fuel is less of a priority. The possibility of a small planet having O2 or hydrocarbon deposit without any hazards makes scanning smaller planets likely the most efficient use of the scanner's AP. By contrast, investing many APs into a large planet which then ends up having a Mankarog is a gigantic waste. The 2AP spent discovering a planet is spent before its size is revealed, meaning that it does not play into the efficiency at all. The only issue with small planets is the high cost of fuel zipping around for that one O2 source, whereas a larger planet may have given O2, steaks, and fuel.[[User:Crumist\|Crumist]] ([[User talk:Crumist\|talk]]) 20:01, 18 February 2014 (MST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:01, 19 February 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	Tips: Discarding small planets	+	~Tips: Discarding small planets
−	I believe the advice to delete any planets of 4 or less zones is misguided, rather smaller planets may be preferred in situations where fuel is less of a priority. The possibility of a small planet having O2 or hydrocarbon deposit without any hazards makes scanning smaller planets likely the most efficient use of the scanner's AP. By contrast, investing many APs into a large planet which then ends up having a Mankarog is a gigantic waste. The 2AP spent discovering a planet is spent before its size is revealed, meaning that it does not play into the efficiency at all. The only issue with small planets is the high cost of fuel zipping around for that one O2 source, whereas a larger planet may have given O2, steaks, and fuel.	+	~I believe the advice to delete any planets of 4 or less zones is misguided, rather smaller planets may be preferred in situations where fuel is less of a priority. The possibility of a small planet having O2 or hydrocarbon deposit without any hazards makes scanning smaller planets likely the most efficient use of the scanner's AP. By contrast, investing many APs into a large planet which then ends up having a Mankarog is a gigantic waste. The 2AP spent discovering a planet is spent before its size is revealed, meaning that it does not play into the efficiency at all. The only issue with small planets is the high cost of fuel zipping around for that one O2 source, whereas a larger planet may have given O2, steaks, and fuel.[[User:Crumist\|Crumist]] ([[User talk:Crumist\|talk]]) 20:01, 18 February 2014 (MST)